<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 2012 Global Atheist Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au</link>
	<description>A Celebration of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:52:54 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins: The biggest damage religion does is brainwashing children by Wolty</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2012/01/25/the-biggest-damage-religion-does-is-brainwashing-children-dawkins/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1107#comment-863</guid>
		<description>Thanks for answering questions davo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for answering questions davo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Christians Stole Christmas by Jim Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2011/12/22/the-christians-stole-christmas/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1006#comment-861</guid>
		<description>CONCEPTION OF JESUS. 

Do you think that Mary and Joseph should have remembered the miraculous events surrounding the birth of Jesus? You would naturally think that when a woman goes through a unique conception, that she would remember it, and that the man who’s wife became pregnant while they were engaged, without any effort on his part, that he would remember it also. It is not something he would easily forget. Yet the gospel writers seem to have strange memory lapses.

According to Luke 2: 42-50, Mary finds Jesus in the temple, she chastises him for causing so much trouble, whereby he replied &quot;Why is it that you are looking for me? Did you not know that I must be concerned with the affairs of my father&quot;. Luke’s gospel adds, &quot;and they (Mary and Joseph) did not understand the saying that he (Jesus) spoke to them.&quot; Mary does not understand, Joseph does not understand, If Mary and Joseph were both visited by angels before the birth of Jesus, how is it that they don’t understand, some twelve years later. Has Mary forgotten that Jesus was supernaturally conceived in such a way as was never experienced by any other person? Is it unlikely that Mary would forget Elizabeth saying to her? &quot;Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit of your womb.&quot; &quot;And why is this (granted) to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me.&quot; Luke 1:42-43, and especially Mary’s own words. &quot;My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my saviour. For he has looked upon the humble state of his slave girl, for, behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed, because the mighty one has done great things to me, and holy is his name.&quot; Luke 1:46-49,

After all of this Mary does not know what Jesus meant when he said that he must be concerned about the affairs of his father. How could Mary and Joseph forget that the wise men Magi worshipped Jesus as a baby and presented him with gold, frankincense, and myrrh? Matthew 2:11, They also seemed to forget how an angel appeared to Joseph telling him to go to Egypt with Mary and Jesus. Matthew 2: 13, and that Herod slew all of the children two years of age or under in Bethlehem. Matthew 2: 16. How could they forget that, (apart from the fact that it fulfilled scripture, 

Hosea 11:1) Why did they have to flee to Egypt ? Did they go to Egypt? According to Luke 2: 39, they went to Nazareth and were not in the dangerous area of Bethlehem, where it is alleged that Herod had the children slain. This creates another problem Herod died four years prior to when the church originally stated that Jesus was born.

Perhaps Matthew’s placing them in Egypt to fulfill scripture was too quick for Joseph and Mary to remember, for Luke 2: 22, has them in Jerusalem for forty days after the birth to fulfill Leviticus 12:1-8, and then in Luke 2:39, they return to Nazareth. They also seemed to forget how the shepherds, made known the saying which had been told to them about this child, Luke 2: 17. Mary and Joseph even forgot, how they marveled ten months after the angelic visitations, that is, one month after the event surrounding Jesus birth.

At that time they were already surprised when Simeon and Anna, the daughter of Phanvel, spoke of Jesus future while he was yet still an infant. Luke 2:25-38.

If these events are historical, why is it that later, during Jesus active period, no one, not even his family, seem to know of his marvelous origins, Matt.13: 54-55, If a conception took place would not Mary have some idea just as to who Jesus was? Would not she reveal this information to her family? Yet we find that Jesus relatives, who came to seize him, Mark 3:21,31, are not told by Mary his mother, who comes and joins them, that contrary to what they think, Jesus is not crazy.

The gospel of John states &quot;For neither did his brothers believe in him&quot; John 7: 5, Did Mary not inform the rest of her children of Jesus divine origins. It is hard to understand that Mary would not inform them that Jesus was the &quot;messiah&quot; so that they might believe in him and thereby enjoy salvation, and what of Mary’s own reaction towards Jesus. In the few appearances that Mary herself makes in the gospels, during the lifetime of Jesus, there is no indication that she showed any understanding that her son Jesus, was the &quot;son of God.&quot; by means of a unique conception. Mark 3:31-35, John 2:3-4. She, Mary revealed no such understanding to his followers.

Jesus earlier followers said that Jesus became the &quot;Son of God&quot; through the resurrection and they never mentioned a unique conception. Paul declared Jesus to be &quot;Son of God&quot; with power, by the resurrection from the dead. Romans 1: 4, see also Acts 13: 33, Where Psalm 2: 7 is applied to the resurrection.

The doctrine of a unique conception seems to have no effect upon Christian teaching prior to its mention in the last part of the first century.

On the basis of New Testament records it is doubtful that Jesus family, or the early believers, and most of all, even Mary herself did not know about the unique conception she is alleged to have undergone.&quot; Did you not know that I must be concerned with the affairs of my Father?&quot; Strange as it may seem, Mary and Joseph did not know it. They did not know it because they had never heard of their son’s &quot;miraculous conception&quot;. It appears that the unique miraculous conception came into circulation long after the deaths of the people in this story.

 

 

Jim. Lee. 9/99.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CONCEPTION OF JESUS. </p>
<p>Do you think that Mary and Joseph should have remembered the miraculous events surrounding the birth of Jesus? You would naturally think that when a woman goes through a unique conception, that she would remember it, and that the man who’s wife became pregnant while they were engaged, without any effort on his part, that he would remember it also. It is not something he would easily forget. Yet the gospel writers seem to have strange memory lapses.</p>
<p>According to Luke 2: 42-50, Mary finds Jesus in the temple, she chastises him for causing so much trouble, whereby he replied &#8220;Why is it that you are looking for me? Did you not know that I must be concerned with the affairs of my father&#8221;. Luke’s gospel adds, &#8220;and they (Mary and Joseph) did not understand the saying that he (Jesus) spoke to them.&#8221; Mary does not understand, Joseph does not understand, If Mary and Joseph were both visited by angels before the birth of Jesus, how is it that they don’t understand, some twelve years later. Has Mary forgotten that Jesus was supernaturally conceived in such a way as was never experienced by any other person? Is it unlikely that Mary would forget Elizabeth saying to her? &#8220;Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit of your womb.&#8221; &#8220;And why is this (granted) to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me.&#8221; Luke 1:42-43, and especially Mary’s own words. &#8220;My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my saviour. For he has looked upon the humble state of his slave girl, for, behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed, because the mighty one has done great things to me, and holy is his name.&#8221; Luke 1:46-49,</p>
<p>After all of this Mary does not know what Jesus meant when he said that he must be concerned about the affairs of his father. How could Mary and Joseph forget that the wise men Magi worshipped Jesus as a baby and presented him with gold, frankincense, and myrrh? Matthew 2:11, They also seemed to forget how an angel appeared to Joseph telling him to go to Egypt with Mary and Jesus. Matthew 2: 13, and that Herod slew all of the children two years of age or under in Bethlehem. Matthew 2: 16. How could they forget that, (apart from the fact that it fulfilled scripture, </p>
<p>Hosea 11:1) Why did they have to flee to Egypt ? Did they go to Egypt? According to Luke 2: 39, they went to Nazareth and were not in the dangerous area of Bethlehem, where it is alleged that Herod had the children slain. This creates another problem Herod died four years prior to when the church originally stated that Jesus was born.</p>
<p>Perhaps Matthew’s placing them in Egypt to fulfill scripture was too quick for Joseph and Mary to remember, for Luke 2: 22, has them in Jerusalem for forty days after the birth to fulfill Leviticus 12:1-8, and then in Luke 2:39, they return to Nazareth. They also seemed to forget how the shepherds, made known the saying which had been told to them about this child, Luke 2: 17. Mary and Joseph even forgot, how they marveled ten months after the angelic visitations, that is, one month after the event surrounding Jesus birth.</p>
<p>At that time they were already surprised when Simeon and Anna, the daughter of Phanvel, spoke of Jesus future while he was yet still an infant. Luke 2:25-38.</p>
<p>If these events are historical, why is it that later, during Jesus active period, no one, not even his family, seem to know of his marvelous origins, Matt.13: 54-55, If a conception took place would not Mary have some idea just as to who Jesus was? Would not she reveal this information to her family? Yet we find that Jesus relatives, who came to seize him, Mark 3:21,31, are not told by Mary his mother, who comes and joins them, that contrary to what they think, Jesus is not crazy.</p>
<p>The gospel of John states &#8220;For neither did his brothers believe in him&#8221; John 7: 5, Did Mary not inform the rest of her children of Jesus divine origins. It is hard to understand that Mary would not inform them that Jesus was the &#8220;messiah&#8221; so that they might believe in him and thereby enjoy salvation, and what of Mary’s own reaction towards Jesus. In the few appearances that Mary herself makes in the gospels, during the lifetime of Jesus, there is no indication that she showed any understanding that her son Jesus, was the &#8220;son of God.&#8221; by means of a unique conception. Mark 3:31-35, John 2:3-4. She, Mary revealed no such understanding to his followers.</p>
<p>Jesus earlier followers said that Jesus became the &#8220;Son of God&#8221; through the resurrection and they never mentioned a unique conception. Paul declared Jesus to be &#8220;Son of God&#8221; with power, by the resurrection from the dead. Romans 1: 4, see also Acts 13: 33, Where Psalm 2: 7 is applied to the resurrection.</p>
<p>The doctrine of a unique conception seems to have no effect upon Christian teaching prior to its mention in the last part of the first century.</p>
<p>On the basis of New Testament records it is doubtful that Jesus family, or the early believers, and most of all, even Mary herself did not know about the unique conception she is alleged to have undergone.&#8221; Did you not know that I must be concerned with the affairs of my Father?&#8221; Strange as it may seem, Mary and Joseph did not know it. They did not know it because they had never heard of their son’s &#8220;miraculous conception&#8221;. It appears that the unique miraculous conception came into circulation long after the deaths of the people in this story.</p>
<p>Jim. Lee. 9/99.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Christians Stole Christmas by Jim Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2011/12/22/the-christians-stole-christmas/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1006#comment-860</guid>
		<description>There was no New Testament Jesus, born of a virgin impregnated by a ghost. This sort of scenario is impossible. If there was a &quot;mortal&quot; Jesus then he was never a Christian, the New Testament referred to him as a Rabbi, and besides Rabbis were married men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no New Testament Jesus, born of a virgin impregnated by a ghost. This sort of scenario is impossible. If there was a &#8220;mortal&#8221; Jesus then he was never a Christian, the New Testament referred to him as a Rabbi, and besides Rabbis were married men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins: The biggest damage religion does is brainwashing children by Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2012/01/25/the-biggest-damage-religion-does-is-brainwashing-children-dawkins/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1107#comment-859</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mock you Graeme but I am somewhat disturbed by the tone of your comment. What does &quot;Thankfully not for too much longer&quot; mean. You seem to be very intolerant of those who do not share your views. 
I would choose the word pity over mock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mock you Graeme but I am somewhat disturbed by the tone of your comment. What does &#8220;Thankfully not for too much longer&#8221; mean. You seem to be very intolerant of those who do not share your views.<br />
I would choose the word pity over mock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins: The biggest damage religion does is brainwashing children by Merridy Mallen</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2012/01/25/the-biggest-damage-religion-does-is-brainwashing-children-dawkins/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Merridy Mallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1107#comment-853</guid>
		<description>Watch Monday&#039;s newspapers (20th February 2012) for details on the Gonski Review into religious school funding.  I suspect they will receive millions of taxpayers dollars for the continuing indoctrination of our children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch Monday&#8217;s newspapers (20th February 2012) for details on the Gonski Review into religious school funding.  I suspect they will receive millions of taxpayers dollars for the continuing indoctrination of our children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins: The biggest damage religion does is brainwashing children by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2012/01/25/the-biggest-damage-religion-does-is-brainwashing-children-dawkins/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1107#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Hi Davo,

Very nice responses, keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Davo,</p>
<p>Very nice responses, keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Christians Stole Christmas by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2011/12/22/the-christians-stole-christmas/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1006#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Oh Graeme,

When I look clouds I seeas  many shapes things as my imagination allows.  But they do not actually exist. You can read into the Bible as much as you want. Doe not mean it is true. There is no atomic bomb in the bible. Seriously! I&#039;ll bet with a little effort you can see computers, black holes, viruses, hippies like jesus. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Graeme,</p>
<p>When I look clouds I seeas  many shapes things as my imagination allows.  But they do not actually exist. You can read into the Bible as much as you want. Doe not mean it is true. There is no atomic bomb in the bible. Seriously! I&#8217;ll bet with a little effort you can see computers, black holes, viruses, hippies like jesus. <img src='http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Christians Stole Christmas by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2011/12/22/the-christians-stole-christmas/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1006#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Graeme,

What does that mean &quot;6 month&quot;. Was Mary already pregnant? Another being?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graeme,</p>
<p>What does that mean &#8220;6 month&#8221;. Was Mary already pregnant? Another being?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Christians Stole Christmas by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2011/12/22/the-christians-stole-christmas/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1006#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Graeme 
Evolution is not accepted by belief, otherwise there would be numerous incompatable  theories on life. This is why there are so many religions and gods when faith (beleive what you want). Evolution is based on overwhelming evidence, tested over 150 years by the best scientists in the world. If it did not work then like other scientifc theories it would be modified or replaced by a better scientifc theory. Religious people can never satisfactorily say why their religion is right and the others wrong. Very dishonest and unfair on children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graeme<br />
Evolution is not accepted by belief, otherwise there would be numerous incompatable  theories on life. This is why there are so many religions and gods when faith (beleive what you want). Evolution is based on overwhelming evidence, tested over 150 years by the best scientists in the world. If it did not work then like other scientifc theories it would be modified or replaced by a better scientifc theory. Religious people can never satisfactorily say why their religion is right and the others wrong. Very dishonest and unfair on children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins: The biggest damage religion does is brainwashing children by Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/2012/01/25/the-biggest-damage-religion-does-is-brainwashing-children-dawkins/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistconvention.org.au/?p=1107#comment-832</guid>
		<description>As someone who believes in scientific analysis rather than faith-based superstitions, I regard the existence of supernatural beings such as gods to be inconceivable, even absurd. Also to expect scientists to disprove the existence of gods is as silly as expecting them to disprove the existence of The Flying Spaghetti Monster. While I acknowledge that religion brings comfort to many people. it is also inevitable that it will breed fundamentalist extremists who are prepared to kill in the name of their religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who believes in scientific analysis rather than faith-based superstitions, I regard the existence of supernatural beings such as gods to be inconceivable, even absurd. Also to expect scientists to disprove the existence of gods is as silly as expecting them to disprove the existence of The Flying Spaghetti Monster. While I acknowledge that religion brings comfort to many people. it is also inevitable that it will breed fundamentalist extremists who are prepared to kill in the name of their religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

